Tabula Peutingeriana – Einzelanzeige

Risca

Henchir-Bichga

Africa Proconsularis

Ortsname ohne Symbol

4C4

schwarz

---

Bisica Lucana (32 E4)

Risca

---

[PK: Verbindungsstrich nach Sicillaba fehlt, Distanzangabe (X) jedoch vorhanden, aber falsch platziert.]

Kommentar (Talbert):
-> stretch to Avitta
The start of this stretch is not marked.

The meaning of the second distance figure (X) placed at the end of this stretch is unclear. To judge by BAtlas 32 E4, it seems improbable that a name has dropped out which called for an extra stretch between Risca and Avitta (note that the lithograph in ItMiller 887 erroneously adds a chicane to the Risca stretch). It seems most likely that the distance figure X was originally placed a little higher, and was attached to a stretch (now omitted) linking either THVRRIS and Avitta, or Risca and Sicilibba. On the ground, the figure would not be accurate, but either route still seems possible in principle. I illustrate missing linework for the second alternative, but this choice is made purely in order to create an illustration. In either case, THVRRIS or Sicilibba would become a crossroads lacking a symbol

-> stretch to Sicilibba
The linework for this stretch is not marked.
See note under Risca-Avitta stretch.

Miller, Itineraria, Sp. 932:
Risca, statt Bisca, municipium (Iss: CIL VIII 12291. 12292. 12296. 12298. 12301 - hier gefunden); j Hr. Bischka. Iss: CIL III 12285-12314. 10; es soll hier 18 stehen.

Datierung (Barrington):
Bisica Lucana – Roman? (AAT I, 34.95; Lepelley 1981, 84-86)

Miller, Itineraria, Sp. 932;

RE: -

17.08.2024 16:04